Skip to content

FINERACT-1108 Custom-installment-in-reshedule#1211

Merged
avikganguly01 merged 1 commit intoapache:developfrom
fynmanoj:AL-9
Aug 14, 2020
Merged

FINERACT-1108 Custom-installment-in-reshedule#1211
avikganguly01 merged 1 commit intoapache:developfrom
fynmanoj:AL-9

Conversation

@fynmanoj
Copy link
Contributor

@fynmanoj fynmanoj commented Jul 29, 2020

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made. Ignore if these details are present on the associated Jira ticket

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1108

Originally located at https://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/AL-9

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

Our guidelines for code reviews is at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide

@fynmanoj fynmanoj force-pushed the AL-9 branch 3 times, most recently from 09cc156 to c7c4185 Compare July 30, 2020 13:09
@vorburger
Copy link
Member

@avikganguly01 knowing that @fynmanoj works with you, and assuming that you are still an active committer to this project (are you?), I was wondering if you would like to engage on code review feedback and possible eventual merge of PRs such as this one? (I don't want to be a bottleneck on this project, and won't have the spare time to help review changes like this. If there are other active committers such as @awasum @ptuomola @xurror or others reading this who want to engage on this PR, please don't let me hold you up / wait for me - I'll ignore this one, and try to help on others.)

@vorburger
Copy link
Member

@fynmanoj this PR needs to have a JIRA issue on the ASF JIRA, instead of referencing an issue from an issue tracker that is now a downstream redistribution of Fineract.

@edcable edcable changed the title AL-9-Custom-installment-in-reshedule FINERACT-1108 Custom-installment-in-reshedule Aug 4, 2020
@edcable edcable requested a review from avikganguly01 August 4, 2020 22:50
Copy link
Contributor

@avikganguly01 avikganguly01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/fineract/builds/713293884 - Can you look at why the deadlock for financial activity type is being caused?

@avikganguly01
Copy link
Contributor

Corresponding backoffice community app UI changes are at link.

@fynmanoj fynmanoj force-pushed the AL-9 branch 2 times, most recently from 19066a0 to 9752366 Compare August 14, 2020 10:46
@avikganguly01
Copy link
Contributor

Deadlock for financial activity type is being caused by a different flaky test and it seems to happen rarely, even in the absence of this PR.

@avikganguly01 avikganguly01 merged commit bd9119e into apache:develop Aug 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants