Skip to content

FINERACT-2598: Add the repaymentStartDateType field to the GET loan response - Part 3b#5838

Merged
adamsaghy merged 1 commit into
apache:developfrom
openMF:FINERACT-2598/repayment-start-date-type-config-applied-to-existing-loans-step-3b
May 11, 2026
Merged

FINERACT-2598: Add the repaymentStartDateType field to the GET loan response - Part 3b#5838
adamsaghy merged 1 commit into
apache:developfrom
openMF:FINERACT-2598/repayment-start-date-type-config-applied-to-existing-loans-step-3b

Conversation

@mariiaKraievska
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made. (Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.)

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per our guidelines
  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.
  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.
  • Follow our coding conventions.
  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes
  • This PR must not be a "code dump". Large changes can be made in a branch, with assistance. Ask for help on the developer mailing list.

Your assigned reviewer(s) will follow our guidelines for code reviews.

@mariiaKraievska mariiaKraievska marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2026 14:42
@adamsaghy adamsaghy merged commit dd04f6b into apache:develop May 11, 2026
245 of 262 checks passed
@adamsaghy adamsaghy deleted the FINERACT-2598/repayment-start-date-type-config-applied-to-existing-loans-step-3b branch May 11, 2026 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants