Skip to content

Conversation

@dianfu
Copy link
Contributor

@dianfu dianfu commented Mar 18, 2020

What is the purpose of the change

This pull request adds support of LocalZonedTimestampType for Python UDF in blink planner.

Brief change log

  • Update the Python operators to pass the timezone information to the Python process
  • Add support of LocalZonedTimestampType in blink planner

Verifying this change

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

  • Added tests test_data_types_only_supported_in_blink_planner in test_udf.py

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

@hequn8128 hequn8128 self-assigned this Mar 18, 2020
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit b8aa27e (Wed Mar 18 11:54:45 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Mar 18, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@hequn8128 hequn8128 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dianfu Thanks a lot for the PR. Some minor comments.

calcProgram,
"BatchExecPythonCalc",
planner.getTableConfig.getConfiguration)
planner.getTableConfig)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change to getConfig(planner.getTableConfig)? so that we don't need to change the signature of createPythonOneInputTransformation()

Comment on lines 495 to 504
if dt.tzinfo is not None:
offset = dt.utcoffset()
offset = offset if offset else datetime.timedelta()
offset_microseconds =\
(offset.days * 86400 + offset.seconds) * 10 ** 6 + offset.microseconds
else:
offset_microseconds = self.EPOCH_ORDINAL
seconds = (calendar.timegm(dt.utctimetuple()) if dt.tzinfo
else time.mktime(dt.timetuple()))
return int(seconds) * 10 ** 6 + dt.microsecond
return int(seconds) * 10 ** 6 + dt.microsecond + offset_microseconds
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Take local timezone into consideration? For example, time 0h in Japen should return -1h in China.

return datetime.datetime


class LocalZonedTimestampCoder(DeterministicCoder):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add python tests for the coder. e.g. tests in test_coders_common.py.

@dianfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

dianfu commented Mar 19, 2020

@hequn8128 Thanks a lot for the review. Updated the PR.

@hequn8128
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Merge this once test passed.

@hequn8128
Copy link
Contributor

@flinkbot run azure

@dianfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

dianfu commented Mar 20, 2020

The failed azure test is a known issue and has already been tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16676

@hequn8128 hequn8128 merged commit 5ccb167 into apache:master Mar 20, 2020
liuzhixing1006 pushed a commit to liuzhixing1006/flink that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
@dianfu dianfu deleted the FLINK-16650 branch June 10, 2020 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants