Skip to content

Conversation

@WeiZhong94
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

This pull request supports iterating MapState and MapView

Brief change log

  • Support iterating MapState and MapView

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (docs)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 9f75014 (Thu Oct 22 05:01:49 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Oct 22, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

} else {
iterator = mapStateIteratorCache.get(iteratorToken);
if (iterator == null) {
throw new RuntimeException("The cached iterator not exist!");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
throw new RuntimeException("The cached iterator not exist!");
throw new RuntimeException("The cached iterator does not exist!");

public static final ConfigOption<Integer> MAP_STATE_ITERATE_CACHE_SIZE = ConfigOptions
.key("python.map-state.iterate-cache-size")
.defaultValue(1000)
.withDescription("The maximum number of entries read from Java side when iterating a " +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about improving the doc a bit to make it more clear what this config option is used for?

if self._underlying_is_write_cache:
# Iterate the data in write cache firstly
try:
key, existed_and_value = next(self._underlying)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
key, existed_and_value = next(self._underlying)
self._last_key, (exists, value) = next(self._underlying)

# cache.
if self._internal_map_state._cleared:
del self._internal_map_state._write_cache[self._last_key]
self._mod_count += 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could refactor a bit to remove the duplicate code

self._write_cache.clear()
self._cleared = False

def _iterate_next_batch(self, iterate_type, iterator_token):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
def _iterate_next_batch(self, iterate_type, iterator_token):
def next_batch(self, iterate_type, iterator_token):

</tr>
<tr>
<td><h5>python.map-state.read.cache.size</h5></td>
<td><h5>python.map-state.iterate-cache-size</h5></td>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

python.map-state.iterate-req-batch-size

@WeiZhong94
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dianfu Thanks for your comments! I have updated this PR.

@dianfu dianfu closed this in d30e523 Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants