[FLINK-25118][streaming] Add vertex topology index prefix in vertex name

[wenlong88]

What is the purpose of the change

this is part of This PR is part of https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job , aims at to support add a vertex index prefix in name of job vertex, which make it easier to match the log / metrics tag to the vertex when debugging at runtime.

Brief change log

• add an optional prefix in name of job vertex, which is in format '[vertext-$index]', index is the topological order of the job vertex.
• add an option to enable the prefix or not.

Verifying this change

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

• added new test in StreamingJobGraphGeneratorTest

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
• The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
• The serializers: (no)
• The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
• Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (no)
• The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (docs)

[flinkbot]

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 1b59e07 (Wed Jan 19 03:08:46 UTC 2022)

Warnings:

• No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

_{Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.}

Review Progress

• ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
• ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
• ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
• ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
• ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details

The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
• @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
• @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
• @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
• @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

[flinkbot]

CI report:

• 1b59e07 Azure: SUCCESS

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

[gaoyunhaii]

Thanks @wenlong88 for the PR! LGTM

[gaoyunhaii]

Merged