Skip to content

Conversation

@rkhachatryan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR includes all the commits from other tickets.

Currently, handling chained entry on copy-on-write uses object
identity to find the wanted entry in the chain. However, if
the same method is running concurrently, the object in the chain
can be replaced by its copy; the condition will never be met and
the chain end will be reached, causing an NPE.

With some tiny changes in timings (i.e. overriding methods of
CopyOnWriteStateMap), StateBackendTestBase.testValueStateRace
fails when running repeatedly (~4 out of 100 runs).

This change replaces object identity with key+namespace equality
in the condition.

The overhead should not be significant because the same check is
already performed to find the element before copying.
…re write

CopyOnWriteStateMap copies the entry before returning it to the client
for update. This also updates its state and entry versions.

However, if the entry is NOT used by any snapshots, the versions
will stay the same despite that state is going to be updated.

With incremental checkpoints, this causes such updated version to
be ignored in the next snapshot.

This change bumps the state version in this case (entry version
stays the same).
Compaction is implemented the same way as in Changelog:
- perform a full snapshot periodically and in the background
- base all future snapshots on it
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Mar 31, 2022

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in the last 180 days.
If you would like to keep this PR alive, please leave a comment asking for a review.
If the PR has merge conflicts, update it with the latest from the base branch.

If you are having difficulty finding a reviewer, please reach out to the [community](https://flink.apache.org/what-is-flink/community/).

If this PR is no longer valid or desired, please feel free to close it. If no activity occurs in the next 90 days, it will be automatically closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR has been closed since it has not had any activity in 120 days.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it,
please feel free to re-open the PR and ask for a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants