[FLINK-39672][docs] Document Java records as supported POJO types#28177
Open
liuml07 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[FLINK-39672][docs] Document Java records as supported POJO types#28177liuml07 wants to merge 1 commit into
liuml07 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> (cherry picked from commit 1990310)
Collaborator
snuyanzin
requested changes
May 19, 2026
Contributor
snuyanzin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@liuml07 instead of having AI as a co-author can you changed it to generated by as mentioned at
https://github.com/apache/flink/blame/1e6a73616eb4e224a149e684c832f20bcba93148/AGENTS.md#L327
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of the change
This backports PR #28149 to
release-2.2for FLINK-39672Java records have been supported as POJO types since Flink 1.19 (FLINK-32380), but the only doc mention lived on the release-1.20 java_compatibility page and was inadvertently removed on master by FLINK-37339.
Brief change log
Parallel updates in docs/content.zh.
Verifying this change
Doc-only change.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving): (yes / no)Documentation
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.7