Skip to content

Conversation

@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

The Dispatcher no longer shuts down the JobManagerRunner in a blocking fashion.
Instead it registers the termination futures and calls the shut down of the
JobManagerSharedServices once all JobManagerRunners have terminated.

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann force-pushed the nonBlockingJobManagerRunner branch from 4a0735b to 9836df1 Compare February 24, 2018 18:21
tillrohrmann added a commit to tillrohrmann/flink that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2018
The Dispatcher no longer shuts down the JobManagerRunner in a blocking fashion.
Instead it registers the termination futures and calls the shut down of the
JobManagerSharedServices once all JobManagerRunners have terminated.

This closes apache#5575.
The Dispatcher no longer shuts down the JobManagerRunner in a blocking fashion.
Instead it registers the termination futures and calls the shut down of the
JobManagerSharedServices once all JobManagerRunners have terminated.

This closes apache#5575.
@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann force-pushed the nonBlockingJobManagerRunner branch from 9836df1 to 2c40697 Compare February 24, 2018 22:19
@asfgit asfgit merged commit 2c40697 into apache:master Feb 25, 2018
@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann deleted the nonBlockingJobManagerRunner branch May 29, 2018 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants