Skip to content

Conversation

@leesf
Copy link
Contributor

@leesf leesf commented Feb 19, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

Fix some typos.

Brief change log

Fix some typos.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ❌ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❌ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❔ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❌ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❌ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot approve description to approve the 1st aspect (similarly, it also supports the consensus, architecture and quality keywords)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval

@StefanRRichter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for fixing the typos, LGTM 👍 Will merge.

@StefanRRichter StefanRRichter merged commit c93eff6 into apache:master Feb 19, 2019
jnh5y pushed a commit to jnh5y/flink that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants