Skip to content

Conversation

@xintongsong
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is a duplication of #9105 on master branch. The original PR #9105 was opened on release-1.9 branch.

…ed memory size into wrong configuration instance.
…otsPerWorker to compute tmCalculatedResourceProfile based on the RM altered configuration.
…at TMs are started with correct managed memory size.
…sk manager managed memory size YarnResourceManagerFactory#getResourceManagerConfiguration.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jul 27, 2019

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit ced1ea2 (Tue Aug 06 15:54:14 UTC 2019)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

…eateSlotsPerWorker to ResourceManagerTest#testCreateWorkerSlotProfiles, and update to verify slot profile calculation with determinate managed memory size.
@xintongsong xintongsong force-pushed the master-FLINK-13241-rm-tm-managed-memory-inconsistent branch from 89ca6ef to bc47897 Compare July 27, 2019 06:15
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jul 27, 2019

CI report:

…_RM_TASKS_MEMORY_MB in configuration."

This reverts commit 50830e8.
@xintongsong xintongsong force-pushed the master-FLINK-13241-rm-tm-managed-memory-inconsistent branch from 9ccfe40 to ced1ea2 Compare July 29, 2019 16:22
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this forward port @xintongsong. LGTM. Merging.

@xintongsong xintongsong deleted the master-FLINK-13241-rm-tm-managed-memory-inconsistent branch July 30, 2019 11:53
wzhero1 pushed a commit to wzhero1/flink that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
…ed memory size into wrong configuration instance.

[FLINK-13241][yarn][test] Update YarnResourceManagerTest#testCreateSlotsPerWorker to compute tmCalculatedResourceProfile based on the RM altered configuration.

[FLINK-13241][yarn][test] Update YarnConfigurationITCase to verify that TMs are started with correct managed memory size.

[FLINK-13241][runtime] Calculating and set managed memory size outside of ResourceManager.

[FLINK-13241][rumtime/yarn][test] Move YarnResourceManagerTest#testCreateSlotsPerWorker to ResourceManagerTest#testCreateWorkerSlotProfiles, and update to verify slot profile calculation with determinate managed memory size.

[FLINK-13241][runtime] Move getResourceManagerConfiguration from ResourceManagerFactory to ResourceManagerUtil.

This closes apache#9246.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants