Skip to content

GEODE-6014: Removed unnecessary null checks.#2813

Merged
nabarunnag merged 1 commit intoapache:developfrom
nabarunnag:feature/GEODE-6014
Nov 14, 2018
Merged

GEODE-6014: Removed unnecessary null checks.#2813
nabarunnag merged 1 commit intoapache:developfrom
nabarunnag:feature/GEODE-6014

Conversation

@nabarunnag
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Geode.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically develop)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

  • Does gradlew build run cleanly?

  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?

  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and
submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. If you need help, please send an
email to dev@geode.apache.org.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mcmellawatt mcmellawatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious how we identified that these null checks are no longer necessary? Were this found through static analysis/IntelliJ tools? Or did you carefully comb through and determine there is no way that these variables could be null?

@nabarunnag
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mcmellawatt These were initially flagged by LGTM, but they were reviewed in the code. If you load the diff using an IDE you can see the reason why these values can't be null

@nabarunnag nabarunnag merged commit 4cc2d46 into apache:develop Nov 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants