[GLUTEN-11622][VL] Add basic TIMESTAMP_NTZ type support#11939
Merged
Conversation
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI on x86 |
Contributor
Author
|
The centos-7 workflow is expected to fail, as the enhanced branch does not contain the required Velox PRs. |
Mariamalmesfer
pushed a commit
to Mariamalmesfer/incubator-gluten
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2026
rui-mo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2026
rui-mo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2026
rui-mo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Enables TimestampNTZ scan by default. Supports Arrow conversion and fallback of unsupported function.
Depends on https://github.com/IBM/velox/tree/ts_ntz_ibm.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No
Related issue: #11622