Skip to content

Conversation

@bkoehm
Copy link
Contributor

@bkoehm bkoehm commented Oct 22, 2025

addresses #1179

@bkoehm bkoehm requested a review from matrei October 22, 2025 22:51
@jamesfredley
Copy link
Contributor

Current failures should be resolved once #1186 is merged.

@jamesfredley jamesfredley linked an issue Oct 22, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@matrei matrei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think some confusion could be avoided if the example "requestmap" domain classes in the documentation was not named Requestmap but MyRequestMap or something different than the config key. Also there seems to be a typo in section 3.7, where the domain class is named RequestMap (uppercase M) in the code example but adjacent text uses Requestmap (lowercase m).

@matrei matrei force-pushed the bkoehm.7.0.x.1179 branch from 65d1f1a to 9f90f67 Compare October 23, 2025 09:17
@bkoehm
Copy link
Contributor Author

bkoehm commented Oct 24, 2025

@matrei I have merged your changes and added commit 9f90f67 to this PR, if you'd like to review it.

@matrei matrei merged commit cdf0cb6 into apache:7.0.x Oct 24, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Grails7 Doc - Requestmap also need a className

3 participants