[#8752] feat(gvfs-python): add fallback for Python gvfs #8869
Merged
mchades merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom Oct 23, 2025
Merged
[#8752] feat(gvfs-python): add fallback for Python gvfs #8869mchades merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
mchades merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
youngyjd
changed the title
youngyjd
changed the title
youngyjd
changed the title
youngyjd
force-pushed
the
python-gvfs-fallback-interface
branch
from
a5a8a70 to
8e04f8a
Compare
mchades
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add fallback support in Python gvfs hooks
Why are the changes needed?
this is the last resort for fallback scenario, in case anything goes wrong with Gravitino server or gvfs. The change in Python GVFS is consistent with the JAVA GVFS change in this PR - #8753
Fix: #8752
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
By default, no behavior change. However, user now can customize fallback.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added and updated