[#9247] fix(iceberg): lazy check for authz configuration items in IRC to start Gravitino server#9420
Merged
yuqi1129 merged 1 commit intobranch-1.1from Dec 9, 2025
Conversation
… to start Gravitino server (#9360) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? 1. move check for authz configuration items from server startup phase to request process phase 2. add dynamic config provider config hints ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #9247 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? add UT and test in local enviroment
FANNG1
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
jerryshao
deleted the
cherry-pick-branch-1.1-7560d64ca9dccc29f522453e92b4fd7711f6b3b9
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #9247
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
How was this patch tested?
add UT and test in local enviroment