Skip to content

Conversation

@TJJack
Copy link
Contributor

@TJJack TJJack commented Mar 23, 2021

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 37s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 1s codespell was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 1s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 14m 21s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 20m 44s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 9m 47s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 compile 7m 58s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 45s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 3m 46s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 15s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 28s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 6m 59s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 15m 4s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 25s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 30s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 10m 38s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javac 10m 38s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 8m 35s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javac 8m 35s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 38s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 3m 25s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 55s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 5s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 7m 27s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 14m 46s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 1m 8s hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 4m 54s hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 2m 57s hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 22m 59s hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 52s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
178m 30s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2803/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #2803
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname Linux 86001b19b1af 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 146bc4c
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2803/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 668 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-common hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2803/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@virajjasani virajjasani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 (non-binding)

@TJJack
Copy link
Contributor Author

TJJack commented Apr 23, 2021

Thanks @virajjasani, please help to merge, the check failures should not be related to these code changes.

@virajjasani
Copy link
Contributor

I thought this was merged with #2804. FYI @goiri

@TJJack
Copy link
Contributor Author

TJJack commented Apr 25, 2021

@virajjasani Exactly, many thanks for your kind reply.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants