Skip to content

[HUDI-9123][RFC-91] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes#12924

Merged
yihua merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
alexr17:HUDI-9123/claim-rfc-91
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

[HUDI-9123][RFC-91] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes#12924
yihua merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
alexr17:HUDI-9123/claim-rfc-91

Conversation

@alexr17
Copy link
Contributor

@alexr17 alexr17 commented Mar 6, 2025

Change Logs

Claims RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider.

Impact

Updates rfc docs.

Risk level (write none, low medium or high below)

None

Documentation Update

None

Contributor's checklist

  • Read through contributor's guide
  • Change Logs and Impact were stated clearly
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable
  • CI passed

@hudi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hudi-bot commented Mar 6, 2025

CI report:

Bot commands @hudi-bot supports the following commands:
  • @hudi-bot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size:XS PR with lines of changes in <= 10 label Mar 6, 2025
@alexr17 alexr17 changed the title [HUDI-9123] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes [HUDI-9123][RFC-90] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes Mar 6, 2025
@alexr17 alexr17 changed the title [HUDI-9123][RFC-90] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes [HUDI-9123][RFC-91] Claim RFC-91 for storage-based lock provider using conditional writes Mar 6, 2025
@yihua
Copy link
Contributor

yihua commented Mar 6, 2025

@alexr17 Thanks for your first contribution!

@yihua yihua merged commit 0f71c31 into apache:master Mar 6, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS PR with lines of changes in <= 10

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants