-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
fix(docker): supervise Java process in entrypoints instead of tail -f /dev/null #3051
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bitflicker64
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
bitflicker64:fix/docker-entrypoints-supervision
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Evidence: PD and Store now execute their foreground scripts with
-d false, but the server entrypoint still startsstart-hugegraph.shin daemon mode and then blocks ontail --pid="$PID" -f /dev/nullat this line. Docker sends SIGTERM to PID 1, so this shell/tail path can exit without signaling the Java PID; the server then waits for Docker's forced kill instead of a graceful shutdown.Please add a TERM/INT trap that kills and waits for
$PID, or otherwise run the server foreground path after the post-start checks, sodocker stopshuts HugeGraphServer down cleanly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch added a
TERM/INTtrap before thetail --pidblock in f20b8a4:When
dumb-initforwards SIGTERM fromdocker stop, the trap fires: sends SIGTERM to Java, polls withkill -0until Java exits cleanly, then exits 0. Thetail --pidcrash-detection path still exits 1 so restart policy fires on a crash.