Skip to content

Comments

[BEAM-77] Create runners/core module for artifact org.apache.beam:runners-core#281

Merged
asfgit merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
kennknowles:runners-core
May 4, 2016
Merged

[BEAM-77] Create runners/core module for artifact org.apache.beam:runners-core#281
asfgit merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
kennknowles:runners-core

Conversation

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

@kennknowles kennknowles commented May 3, 2016

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

This is strictly creating the module and moving one easy class to it.
Many of the utilities in org.apache.beam.util and subpackages should
move as developments allow.

@kennknowles kennknowles force-pushed the runners-core branch 3 times, most recently from d9caf02 to ee8a9ce Compare May 3, 2016 21:21
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

R: @davorbonaci @jbonofre

I haven't worked too hard at the pom.xml. I also haven't gone through the loop of letting the dependency analysis clean up the deps, but this is the basic idea. Please comment!

@kennknowles kennknowles force-pushed the runners-core branch 3 times, most recently from 71d9c85 to 7005dc1 Compare May 3, 2016 22:16

<artifactId>runners-core</artifactId>
<name>Apache Beam :: Runners :: Core</name>
<description>
Copy link
Member

@davorbonaci davorbonaci May 3, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

inline: <desc>Xyz</desc>

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does that matter? The formatting gets bad.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nevermind; short enough for one line.

@kennknowles kennknowles force-pushed the runners-core branch 3 times, most recently from 984658c to 2221c5e Compare May 4, 2016 03:24
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Please take another look when you get a chance. The two commits are independent, not to be squashed.

<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<scope>provided</scope>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

scope test?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member

LGTM, modulo resolution of pending comments. (I probably don't need to take another look, unless there's something contentious.)

@kennknowles kennknowles changed the title Create runners/core module for artifact org.apache.beam:runners-core [BEAM-77] Create runners/core module for artifact org.apache.beam:runners-core May 4, 2016
This is strictly creating the module and moving one easy class to it.
Many of the utilities in org.apache.beam.util and subpackages should
move as developments allow.
@asfgit asfgit merged commit 78798ad into apache:master May 4, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2016
iemejia pushed a commit to iemejia/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2018
mareksimunek added a commit to mareksimunek/beam that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants