Consider TTL of device in Region scan for active data

[ycycse]

Data may remains in database even if it's out-dated due to the TTL. We need to filter such data in region scan.

Different from series scan which contains only one device which can use the TTL info of that device to update timeFilter,
a lot of devices share the same timeFilter in region scan.

So we can't update the timeFilter in advance, we need to calculate the real time range by TTL of the specified device one by one. In such procedure, we can use some cache technology to reduce the cost.

In this PR, we use a new timeFilter TimeFilterForDeviceTTL to replace the original timeFilter for above purpose.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 58 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.71%. Comparing base (cbfaca6) to head (2be87c0).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
.../apache/iotdb/db/utils/TimeFilterForDeviceTTL.java	0.00%	24 Missing ⚠️
...ueryengine/plan/planner/OperatorTreeGenerator.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...operator/source/RegionScanForActiveDeviceUtil.java	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...or/source/AbstractRegionScanForActiveDataUtil.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...ator/source/RegionScanForActiveTimeSeriesUtil.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...perator/source/ActiveDeviceRegionScanOperator.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...tor/source/ActiveTimeSeriesRegionScanOperator.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #12890      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     41.72%   41.71%   -0.02%     
  Complexity       71       71              
============================================
  Files          3319     3323       +4     
  Lines        210010   210091      +81     
  Branches      24965    24967       +2     
============================================
+ Hits          87622    87631       +9     
- Misses       122388   122460      +72     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud