Skip to content

Ignore mem chunks whose data type is not matched#15617

Merged
JackieTien97 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ignoreMemChunksWhoseDataTypeNotMatch
May 30, 2025
Merged

Ignore mem chunks whose data type is not matched#15617
JackieTien97 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ignoreMemChunksWhoseDataTypeNotMatch

Conversation

@shuwenwei
Copy link
Member

Description

Ignore mem chunks whose data type is not matched

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.14%. Comparing base (565f1bf) to head (0968f07).
Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...engine/schemaregion/utils/ResourceByPathUtils.java 81.81% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #15617      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     39.06%   39.14%   +0.08%     
  Complexity      198      198              
============================================
  Files          4740     4821      +81     
  Lines        307744   311682    +3938     
  Branches      38474    39049     +575     
============================================
+ Hits         120212   122013    +1801     
- Misses       187532   189669    +2137     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 merged commit 0996da2 into master May 30, 2025
60 checks passed
@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 deleted the ignoreMemChunksWhoseDataTypeNotMatch branch May 30, 2025 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants