Skip to content

Fixed the potential non-consistency caused by initialize of DataNodeTableCache & Cleared the storageGroups in compatible codes#16693

Merged
Caideyipi merged 10 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Caideyipi:observer
Nov 10, 2025
Merged

Fixed the potential non-consistency caused by initialize of DataNodeTableCache & Cleared the storageGroups in compatible codes#16693
Caideyipi merged 10 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Caideyipi:observer

Conversation

@Caideyipi
Copy link
Collaborator

@Caideyipi Caideyipi commented Nov 3, 2025

Description

As the title said.


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@Caideyipi Caideyipi changed the title Fixed the potential non-consistency caused by initialize of DataNodeTableCache Fixed the potential non-consistency caused by initialize of DataNodeTableCache & Cleared the storageGroups in compatible codes Nov 3, 2025
@Caideyipi Caideyipi merged commit 639de52 into apache:master Nov 10, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@Caideyipi Caideyipi deleted the observer branch November 10, 2025 09:27
JackieTien97 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2025
…ableCache & Cleared the storageGroups in compatible codes (#16693)

* fix

* refactor

* may-complete

* fix

* refactor

* fix

* Update IoTDBFlushQueryIT.java

* bug-fix

* fix

(cherry picked from commit 639de52)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments