Skip to content

[To rel/0.11] [IOTDB-1069] restrict the flushing memtable number to avoid OOM when mem_control is disabled #2317

Merged
qiaojialin merged 13 commits intorel/0.11from
restrict_memtable_11
Dec 27, 2020
Merged

[To rel/0.11] [IOTDB-1069] restrict the flushing memtable number to avoid OOM when mem_control is disabled #2317
qiaojialin merged 13 commits intorel/0.11from
restrict_memtable_11

Conversation

@HTHou
Copy link
Contributor

@HTHou HTHou commented Dec 23, 2020

Same as #2315

@HTHou HTHou added bug Something isn't working Module - Storage Engine labels Dec 23, 2020
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

warning The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 11.
Read more here

@qiaojialin qiaojialin merged commit 5afe292 into rel/0.11 Dec 27, 2020
@qiaojialin qiaojialin deleted the restrict_memtable_11 branch December 27, 2020 06:00
@qiaojialin qiaojialin restored the restrict_memtable_11 branch December 27, 2020 06:30
qiaojialin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2020
…ber to avoid OOM when mem_control is disabled (#2317)"

This reverts commit 5afe292.
qiaojialin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2020
…ber to avoid OOM when mem_control is disabled (#2317)" (#2349)

This reverts commit 5afe292.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working Module - Storage Engine

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants