Skip to content

[IOTDB-2705] Separate CQ persistence from MLog#5187

Merged
SteveYurongSu merged 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
MarcosZyk:refactor_cq_log
Mar 9, 2022
Merged

[IOTDB-2705] Separate CQ persistence from MLog#5187
SteveYurongSu merged 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
MarcosZyk:refactor_cq_log

Conversation

@MarcosZyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Problem

The storage of CQ task has nothing to do with mlog nor even metadata module and it affects the following work of SchemaEngine refactor.

Solution

Use CQLog to persist CQ operations.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Mar 8, 2022

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 67.868% when pulling 38d6913 on MarcosZyk:refactor_cq_log into 1584871 on apache:master.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu merged commit 6c0f35e into apache:master Mar 9, 2022
@MarcosZyk MarcosZyk deleted the refactor_cq_log branch April 22, 2022 07:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants