[Jena5] GH-2076: Fix for Iterator.remove in GraphMem#2081
Merged
afs merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Nov 7, 2023
Merged
Conversation
kinow
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GitHub issue resolved #2076
This is the jena5 branch fix for #2076 for legacy GraphMem.
There is no test. We don't have an example of the bug for Jena5. The bug is both hash-dependent and sensitive to the order of insertion of triples.
There is a test case for the jena4 in PR #2080
Changes to
Nodemean the example for Jena4 no longer applies.By submitting this pull request, I acknowledge that I am making a contribution to the Apache Software Foundation under the terms and conditions of the Contributor's Agreement.