Skip to content

fix(sec): upgrade org.apache.jena:jena-arq to 4.9.0#2234

Closed
suguds wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
suguds:oscs_fix_cmtg9eoau51oj0c3u3b0
Closed

fix(sec): upgrade org.apache.jena:jena-arq to 4.9.0#2234
suguds wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
suguds:oscs_fix_cmtg9eoau51oj0c3u3b0

Conversation

@suguds
Copy link

@suguds suguds commented Feb 1, 2024

What happened?

There are 1 security vulnerabilities found in org.apache.jena:jena-arq 4.8.0

What did I do?

Upgrade org.apache.jena:jena-arq from 4.8.0 to 4.9.0 for vulnerability fix

What did you expect to happen?

Ideally, no insecure libs should be used.

How can we automate the detection of these types of issues?

By using the GitHub Actions configurations provided by murphysec, we can conduct automatic code security checks in our CI pipeline.

The specification of the pull request

PR Specification from OSCS

@rvesse
Copy link
Member

rvesse commented Feb 1, 2024

Thanks for the PR but in this case we cannot accept it.

The module containing the 4.8.0 dependency is purely a benchmarking module used to compare performance numbers between the old version of one of our core API implementations with a newer version that was introduced from 4.9.0 onwards. So the usage of 4.8.0 is a) intentional and b) only for performance benchmarking purposes to ensure no substantative performance regressions. The usage of 4.8.0 within the benchmarking is tightly scoped to the API under test and does not use any of the portions of the API affected by CVE-2023-32200

As such there is no security risk involved here and I will close this issue

Please note that for future reference any security issues with any Apache project should be reported using the Apache Security Process and not via public PRs/issues.

@rvesse rvesse closed this Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants