Skip to content

[feature][COM][commons] add log level filtering capability#5382

Merged
casionone merged 3 commits intoapache:dev-1.9.0from
aiceflower:relaese-1.9.0-resultset-sensitive-masking
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

[feature][COM][commons] add log level filtering capability#5382
casionone merged 3 commits intoapache:dev-1.9.0from
aiceflower:relaese-1.9.0-resultset-sensitive-masking

Conversation

@aiceflower
Copy link
Member

@aiceflower aiceflower commented Mar 26, 2026

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar feature requirement.

Problem Description

Log output needs level-based filtering capability for better log management.

Description

Add log level filtering feature to control which log levels are printed.

Use case

Users can configure log level filtering to reduce noise and focus on relevant log entries in production environments.

Solutions

  1. Added log level filtering configuration
  2. Implemented log level filter in logging framework
  3. Added documentation for log level filtering

Anything else

None.

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

@aiceflower aiceflower changed the title [feat][COM][storage] add resultset field masking and truncation support [feature][COM][commons] add log level filtering capability Mar 26, 2026
@aiceflower aiceflower changed the title [feature][COM][commons] add log level filtering capability [feature][com][commons] add log level filtering capability Mar 26, 2026
@aiceflower aiceflower changed the title [feature][com][commons] add log level filtering capability [feature][COM][commons] add log level filtering capability Mar 26, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@casionone casionone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@casionone casionone merged commit 2354bd1 into apache:dev-1.9.0 Mar 26, 2026
5 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants