LUCENE-10379: Count directly into the dense values array in FastTaxonomyFacetCounts#countAll#605
Merged
gsmiller merged 1 commit intoJan 13, 2022
Conversation
…omyFacetCounts#countAll Co-authored-by: guofeng.my <guofeng.my@bytedance.com>
Contributor
Author
|
I'm seeing the nice performance improvement locally that @gf2121 and I both observed with LUCENE-10350, so I'm going to go ahead and merge this, which is just a portion of LUCENE-10350 (and hopefully not the portion responsible for the nightly bench regressions). |
Contributor
|
This is great! Thanks @gsmiller ! |
Contributor
|
I'm seeing BrowseMonthTaxoFacets increased 30% without any regression in last night benchmark, Thanks @gsmiller for such a great idea ! |
Contributor
Author
|
@gf2121 glad it worked out. Now I just wish we could understand what exactly was causing the regression with the other part of the change. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change just pulls out part of the optimization done (and subsequently reverted) in LUCENE-10350. The idea is to push only part of the optimization to see if we can isolate the performance regression observed in LUCENE-10350. See LUCENE-10374 for more.