Skip to content

NIFI-5242: Exclude JTS dependency from Elasticsearch client#2741

Closed
mattyb149 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
mattyb149:NIFI-5242
Closed

NIFI-5242: Exclude JTS dependency from Elasticsearch client#2741
mattyb149 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
mattyb149:NIFI-5242

Conversation

@mattyb149
Copy link
Contributor

I ran the full suite of unit tests and also tried with DeleteByQueryElasticsearch which uses the CS that was bringing in the JTS dependency, all worked well.

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 65beec3 May 27, 2018
@MikeThomsen
Copy link
Contributor

I ran it against the full integration suite for the client service and it worked just fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants