Skip to content

NIFI-6904 Moving ClassLoader creation before Authorizer instantiation#3903

Closed
bbende wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bbende:authorizer-factory
Closed

NIFI-6904 Moving ClassLoader creation before Authorizer instantiation#3903
bbende wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bbende:authorizer-factory

Conversation

@bbende
Copy link
Contributor

@bbende bbende commented Nov 25, 2019

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.

Please provide a short description of the PR here:

Description of PR

Enables X functionality; fixes bug NIFI-YYYY.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not squash or use --force when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes.

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on both JDK 8 and JDK 11?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

@bbende bbende requested a review from mcgilman November 25, 2019 14:14
@mcgilman
Copy link
Contributor

Will review...

Copy link
Contributor

@bahlulh bahlulh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the logs are needed.

// start with ClassLoad from authorizer's bundle
final Bundle authorizerBundle = authorizerBundles.get(0);
ClassLoader authorizerClassLoader = authorizerBundle.getClassLoader();
logger.info("Got Authorizer ClassLoader from bundle");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need these logs?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that log statement should definitely go. Or be changed to debug. Or be updated to provide actual context.

Copy link
Contributor

@mcgilman mcgilman Nov 25, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your comments. That log statement was removed and the second more meaningful log statement was given more context.

dd62068

@asfgit asfgit closed this in dd62068 Nov 25, 2019
@mcgilman
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.

patricker pushed a commit to patricker/nifi that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2020
natural pushed a commit to natural/nifi that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2020
ekovacs pushed a commit to ekovacs/nifi-apache that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants