Skip to content

NIFI-9081 Updated nifi-framework-api tests to JUnit 5.#5333

Closed
MikeThomsen wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
MikeThomsen:NIFI-9081
Closed

NIFI-9081 Updated nifi-framework-api tests to JUnit 5.#5333
MikeThomsen wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
MikeThomsen:NIFI-9081

Conversation

@MikeThomsen
Copy link
Contributor

Updated nifi-external tests to JUnit 5.
Updated nifi-stateless to use JUnit 5.
Updated nifi-api to use JUnit 5.

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.

Please provide a short description of the PR here:

Description of PR

Enables X functionality; fixes bug NIFI-YYYY.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically main)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not squash or use --force when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes.

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

Updated nifi-external tests to JUnit 5.
Updated nifi-stateless to use JUnit 5.
Updated nifi-api to use JUnit 5.
Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request looks close to completion, thanks @MikeThomsen. Just noted to places where fail() inside a try-catch could be replaced with assertThrows, otherwise this looks good.

Comment on lines 131 to 130
sinkTask.flush(Collections.emptyMap());
Assert.fail("Expected RetriableException to be thrown");
fail("Expected RetriableException to be thrown");
} catch (final RetriableException re) {
// Expected
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be changed to use assertThrows().

Comment on lines 146 to 145
sourceTask.poll();
Assert.fail("Expected RetriableException to be thrown");
fail("Expected RetriableException to be thrown");
} catch (final RetriableException re) {
// Expected
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be changed to use assertThrows().

@MikeThomsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@exceptionfactory changes made.

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @MikeThomsen, looks good! +1 Merging.

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

Merged in 6a55c6c

@MikeThomsen MikeThomsen deleted the NIFI-9081 branch September 11, 2021 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants