Skip to content

NIFI-10203: Fixed bug in which same FlowFile Builder was used repeate…#6187

Closed
markap14 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
markap14:NIFI-10203
Closed

NIFI-10203: Fixed bug in which same FlowFile Builder was used repeate…#6187
markap14 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
markap14:NIFI-10203

Conversation

@markap14
Copy link
Contributor

@markap14 markap14 commented Jul 8, 2022

…dly for multiple FlowFiles; this caused mingling of their attributes when a FlowFile is routed to a relationship that has more than 1 destination (i.e., many connections with the same Relationship)

Summary

NIFI-00000

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 8
    • JDK 11
    • JDK 17

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

…dly for multiple FlowFiles; this caused mingling of their attributes when a FlowFile is routed to a relationship that has more than 1 destination (i.e., many connections with the same Relationship)
Copy link
Contributor

@greyp9 greyp9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks good. Thanks for the unit test, it illustrated the problem exactly.

I triggered the MacOS automation again; I expect that the failure was a transient.

@greyp9 greyp9 closed this in 996d8fa Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants