Skip to content

NIFI-11299 - upgrade slf4j to 2.0.7#7054

Closed
pvillard31 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
pvillard31:NIFI-11299
Closed

NIFI-11299 - upgrade slf4j to 2.0.7#7054
pvillard31 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
pvillard31:NIFI-11299

Conversation

@pvillard31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

NIFI-11299 - Upgrade SLF4J to 2.0.7

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 11
    • JDK 17

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @pvillard31! +1 merging

exceptionfactory pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
This closes #7054

Signed-off-by: David Handermann <exceptionfactory@apache.org>
r-vandenbos pushed a commit to r-vandenbos/nifi that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
This closes apache#7054

Signed-off-by: David Handermann <exceptionfactory@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants