Skip to content

NIFI-14161: Fix QueryCassandra Processor Attribute Loss Issue#9637

Closed
Rahul937303 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:support/nifi-1.28from
Rahul937303:support/nifi-1.28
Closed

NIFI-14161: Fix QueryCassandra Processor Attribute Loss Issue#9637
Rahul937303 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:support/nifi-1.28from
Rahul937303:support/nifi-1.28

Conversation

@Rahul937303
Copy link

Resolved an issue in the QueryCassandra processor where attributes from the incoming FlowFile were occasionally lost in subsequent FlowFiles when the processor split the results due to a configured Fetch Size (e.g., 750). This fix ensures that all FlowFiles maintain the original attributes, even when multiple FlowFiles are generated from a single query result.

@pvillard31
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for pull request! Any commit that should land on NiFi 1.x should be via a PR against the branch https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/support/nifi-1.x. However, I don't think the community is willing to invest additional time in making new releases for the 1.x branch. It is, of course, up to any committer/PMC member to decide if such a release should happen though and if, collectively, enough people are willing to go through the release process which is quite time consuming.

@pvillard31 pvillard31 changed the base branch from support/nifi-1.28 to support/nifi-1.x January 16, 2025 13:05
@pvillard31 pvillard31 changed the base branch from support/nifi-1.x to support/nifi-1.28 January 16, 2025 13:05
@joewitt
Copy link
Contributor

joewitt commented Jan 23, 2025

As per the end of support notice on https://nifi.apache.org/download/ I dont think this change should proceed.

Please submit this change against the 2.x branch if appropriate. Thanks

@joewitt joewitt closed this Jan 23, 2025
@Rahul937303
Copy link
Author

Hi joewitt
Currently, there is no 2.x branch available. Could you please clarify where this change should be submitted?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants