Skip to content

NIFI-14322: Creating processor to fetch Box file using a representation#9769

Closed
ncover21 wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
ncover21:NIFI-14322
Closed

NIFI-14322: Creating processor to fetch Box file using a representation#9769
ncover21 wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
ncover21:NIFI-14322

Conversation

@ncover21
Copy link
Contributor

@ncover21 ncover21 commented Mar 4, 2025

Summary

A processor responsible for fetching a specific Box File using a Representation.
https://developer.box.com/guides/representations/

NIFI-14322

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for putting together this new Processor @ncover21! The overall approach looks good, I just noted a few recommendations. There also appears to be one Checkstyle violation that needs to be corrected.

@ncover21
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncover21 commented Mar 5, 2025

Thanks for putting together this new Processor @ncover21! The overall approach looks good, I just noted a few recommendations. There also appears to be one Checkstyle violation that needs to be corrected.

Thanks David for the review, comments have been addressed.

@pvillard31 pvillard31 closed this in 626e828 Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants