Skip to content

NIFI-14586, NIFI-14587: Expose Processors' Performance Metrics in the…#9963

Closed
markap14 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
markap14:NIFI-14586
Closed

NIFI-14586, NIFI-14587: Expose Processors' Performance Metrics in the…#9963
markap14 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
markap14:NIFI-14586

Conversation

@markap14
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

… UI as part of the Status History; in doing so, I discovered a bug in which the GC time was not being tracked properly and fixed it. Sorted counter values lexicographically.

Summary

NIFI-00000

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

… UI as part of the Status History; in doing so, I discovered a bug in which the GC time was not being tracked properly and fixed it. Sorted counter values lexicographically.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pvillard31 pvillard31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed all graphs are at 0 OOTB with proper message if hovering the graph name in the dropdown list. Then configured NiFi with tracking performance at 50% and confirmed that we have the data available in the status history of the processors. Thanks for the improvement @markap14 , merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants