Skip to content

Conversation

@jzonthemtn
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for contributing to Apache OpenNLP.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with OPENNLP-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn clean install at the root opennlp folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file in opennlp folder?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found in opennlp folder?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 57.102% when pulling 6114b9c on jzonthemtn:OPENNLP-1035 into 3ba27e9 on apache:master.


ResourceAsStreamFactory stream = new ResourceAsStreamFactory(
getClass(), "/opennlp/tools/formats/brown-cluster.txt");

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we refactor the above into a setUp() method and not having to repeat for each test

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Simplifies things a bit.

00010 Rue-de-Grandes-Illusions 1
00010 good. 1
00010 Barmerstr. 1
00010 B�rgerstra�e 1
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have an encoding issue here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I generated that from AnnotatedSentences.txt and it looks like it has those characters. Since those lines weren't needed for these tests I just removed them.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 57.269% when pulling 988001f on jzonthemtn:OPENNLP-1035 into f74a86f on apache:master.


String[] tokens = new String[] {"he", "went", "with", "you"};

AdaptiveFeatureGenerator generator = new BrownBigramFeatureGenerator(brownCluster);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line can be moved up to the @before method too.

private BrownCluster brownCluster;

@Before
public void before() throws IOException {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: call this method setUp() ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got them. Thanks.

@smarthi
Copy link
Member

smarthi commented Apr 25, 2017

+1 lgtm, will merge now

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 6059525 Apr 25, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 57.363% when pulling 3ed710b on jzonthemtn:OPENNLP-1035 into 4060217 on apache:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants