-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
PHOENIX-6696 Drop legacy phoenix-client jar #1427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Doesn't seem relevant to this PR but I see lots of |
|
Otherwise +1 for dropping phoenix-client and making only embedded jar available (target version only 5.2.x) |
gjacoby126
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm but one question about phoenix-tools
| </activation> | ||
| <modules> | ||
| <module>phoenix-client-parent</module> | ||
| <module>phoenix-client-parent/phoenix-client</module> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Drop phoenix-client-parent/phoenix-client directory and pom.xml too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could.
However, I plan to have at least one more variant that that can coexist hbase-shaded-client (PHOENIX-6053), and it's easier to keep the structure than to remove and re-add it later.
If you feel strongly about it, then we certainly can remove this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, you mean just the phoenix-client directory.
Sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
Yes, we have a lot of those lately (we get that in our downstream tests, too). |
No description provided.