Use streamType for parsing and validating protobuf decoder config

[navina]

What does this PR do

Fixes #11530

[navina]

Label: bugfix

@xiangfu0 / @Jackie-Jiang : review pls!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #11544 (8b60f67) into master (017e813) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 42.85%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #11544      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     63.06%   63.03%   -0.04%     
- Complexity     1106     1108       +2     
============================================
  Files          2320     2320              
  Lines        124664   124666       +2     
  Branches      19033    19033              
============================================
- Hits          78618    78580      -38     
- Misses        40441    40492      +51     
+ Partials       5605     5594      -11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	<0.01% <0.00%> (ø)
integration1	<0.01% <0.00%> (ø)
integration2	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
java-11	62.99% <42.85%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
java-17	62.89% <42.85%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
java-20	62.89% <42.85%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
temurin	63.03% <42.85%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unittests	63.02% <42.85%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unittests1	67.44% <42.85%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests2	14.49% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...he/pinot/segment/local/utils/TableConfigUtils.java	70.63% <42.85%> (-0.07%)	⬇️

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JeffBolle]

When calling streamConfig.getDecoderProperties(), you get back a map of just the decoder properties that, for the test data, looks like this:

{protoClassName=test, descriptorFile=file://test}

The checks in validateDecoder can be substantially more simple (and not require any stream config knowledge).

I created a PR with my fixes here: #11551

Sorry @navina for putting us down the wrong path with too cursory of a look at the validation code.

[xiangfu0]

Closed as a duplicate.