Skip to content

Fix LOOKUP join#15223

Merged
yashmayya merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Jackie-Jiang:fix_lookup_join
Mar 18, 2025
Merged

Fix LOOKUP join#15223
yashmayya merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Jackie-Jiang:fix_lookup_join

Conversation

@Jackie-Jiang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Jackie-Jiang Jackie-Jiang commented Mar 7, 2025

#14893 accidentally removed the workerIdToSegmentsMap and broke LOOKUP join. This PR adds that back. Tested with LookupJoinEngineQuickStart

TODO: Add a query test for LOOKUP join

@Jackie-Jiang Jackie-Jiang added bugfix multi-stage Related to the multi-stage query engine labels Mar 7, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.57%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (16008f1).
Report is 1826 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #15223      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   63.57%   +1.81%     
- Complexity      207     1461    +1254     
============================================
  Files          2436     2761     +325     
  Lines        133233   155613   +22380     
  Branches      20636    23929    +3293     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    98926   +16652     
- Misses        44911    49241    +4330     
- Partials       6048     7446    +1398     
Flag Coverage Δ
custom-integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration2 0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11 63.54% <100.00%> (+1.83%) ⬆️
java-21 63.45% <100.00%> (+1.83%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false 63.56% <100.00%> (+1.81%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true 63.43% <100.00%> (+35.70%) ⬆️
temurin 63.57% <100.00%> (+1.81%) ⬆️
unittests 63.56% <100.00%> (+1.82%) ⬆️
unittests1 56.19% <100.00%> (+9.30%) ⬆️
unittests2 34.00% <0.00%> (+6.27%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@krishan1390
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Jackie-Jiang Added a test case for this in #15244

Should we merge that PR to this branch ? Or should I wait for this PR to be merged first and then merge the test case to master ?

@yashmayya yashmayya merged commit ad5bb40 into apache:master Mar 18, 2025
22 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yashmayya yashmayya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@krishan1390 you can rebase your PR on the latest master and I can then merge yours as well, thanks.

@Jackie-Jiang Jackie-Jiang deleted the fix_lookup_join branch March 18, 2025 19:25
tsekityam pushed a commit to tsekityam/pinot that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
yashmayya pushed a commit to yashmayya/pinot that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
@xiangfu0 xiangfu0 added the bug Something is not working as expected label Mar 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something is not working as expected multi-stage Related to the multi-stage query engine

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants