[wip] optimise consumption in order

[noob-se7en]

Instructions:

1. The PR has to be tagged with at least one of the following labels (*):
   1. feature
   2. bugfix
   3. performance
   4. ui
   5. backward-incompat
   6. release-notes (**)
2. Remove these instructions before publishing the PR.

(*) Other labels to consider:

• testing
• dependencies
• docker
• kubernetes
• observability
• security
• code-style
• extension-point
• refactor
• cleanup

(**) Use release-notes label for scenarios like:

• New configuration options
• Deprecation of configurations
• Signature changes to public methods/interfaces
• New plugins added or old plugins removed

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 33.82%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (edd8cde).
Report is 1946 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ore/data/manager/realtime/ConsumerCoordinator.java	0.00%	18 Missing ⚠️
...a/manager/realtime/RealtimeSegmentDataManager.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...ata/manager/realtime/RealtimeTableDataManager.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (59551e4) and HEAD (edd8cde). Click for more details.

HEAD has 6 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (59551e4)	HEAD (edd8cde)
skip-bytebuffers-false	7	6
unittests	5	3
unittests1	2	0
java-11	5	4

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #15403       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     61.75%   33.82%   -27.93%     
- Complexity      207      690      +483     
=============================================
  Files          2436     2816      +380     
  Lines        133233   159601    +26368     
  Branches      20636    24484     +3848     
=============================================
- Hits          82274    53987    -28287     
- Misses        44911   101290    +56379     
+ Partials       6048     4324     -1724     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	33.80% <0.00%> (-27.91%)	⬇️
java-21	33.74% <0.00%> (-27.88%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-false	33.82% <0.00%> (-27.93%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-true	33.72% <0.00%> (+6.00%)	⬆️
temurin	33.82% <0.00%> (-27.93%)	⬇️
unittests	33.82% <0.00%> (-27.93%)	⬇️
unittests1	?
unittests2	33.82% <0.00%> (+6.09%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.