throw when integer overflow occurs

[richardstartin]

Fixes #8701 by throwing early. The workaround is to start using V3 or V4.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #8710 (d500482) into master (d3c97d5) will decrease coverage by 55.35%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #8710       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     69.67%   14.31%   -55.36%     
+ Complexity     4571      168     -4403     
=============================================
  Files          1722     1677       -45     
  Lines         89862    87930     -1932     
  Branches      13335    13125      -210     
=============================================
- Hits          62610    12589    -50021     
- Misses        22920    74410    +51490     
+ Partials       4332      931     -3401     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration1	?
integration2	?
unittests1	?
unittests2	14.31% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../io/writer/impl/BaseChunkSVForwardIndexWriter.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-86.21%)	⬇️
...src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/sql/FilterKind.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...ain/java/org/apache/pinot/core/data/table/Key.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...in/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/StringUtil.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/BooleanUtils.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../java/org/apache/pinot/core/data/table/Record.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../java/org/apache/pinot/core/util/GroupByUtils.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...java/org/apache/pinot/spi/trace/BaseRecording.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...java/org/apache/pinot/spi/trace/NoOpRecording.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...ava/org/apache/pinot/spi/config/table/FSTType.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
... and 1342 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d3c97d5...d500482. Read the comment docs.

[snleee]

LGTM. Thanks for the quick fix on this :)

[jtao15]

LGTM. Thanks for fixing this!

[richardstartin]

Just for posterity, Pinot raw forward indexes have always had this limitation; it wasn’t a regression.