[issue-12272] PulsarAuthorizationProvider initialization#12273
Merged
merlimat merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Oct 4, 2021
Merged
[issue-12272] PulsarAuthorizationProvider initialization#12273merlimat merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
merlimat merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2021
merlimat
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2021
merlimat
added
doc-not-needed
bharanic-dev
pushed a commit
to bharanic-dev/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #12272
Motivation
Address a breaking change related to existing authorization providers.
Modifications
Update the
PulsarAuthorizationProviderbase class to to support old-style initialization.Verifying this change
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
Documentation