fix checkstyle for tired-storage, websocket and bc modules#13748
Merged
eolivelli merged 6 commits intoapache:masterfrom Jan 20, 2022
Merged
fix checkstyle for tired-storage, websocket and bc modules#13748eolivelli merged 6 commits intoapache:masterfrom
eolivelli merged 6 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
nlu90
commented
Jan 13, 2022
pulsar-websocket/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/websocket/stats/JvmMetrics.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Member
Author
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
hezhangjian
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2022
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2022
Contributor
|
@nlu90 Please help resolve the conflicts |
Member
Author
|
@codelipenghui Please take a look |
Member
Author
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Modifications
fixed module
tiered-storage,pulsar-websocketandbouncycastleVerifying this change
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If
yeswas chosen, please highlight the changesDocumentation
Check the box below or label this PR directly (if you have committer privilege).
Need to update docs?
doc-required(If you need help on updating docs, create a doc issue)
no-need-doccheckstyle fix
doc(If this PR contains doc changes)