Skip to content

[SCB-729] Instance cache check#809

Merged
wujimin merged 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
wujimin:instance-cache-check
Jul 19, 2018
Merged

[SCB-729] Instance cache check#809
wujimin merged 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
wujimin:instance-cache-check

Conversation

@wujimin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wujimin wujimin commented Jul 16, 2018

1.instance cache check task can be trigger periodically or manually
2.after check will post "InstanceCacheSummary" event, subscriber should subscrbe the event, and run their special logic

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Jul 16, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 87.125% when pulling c7dbbd8 on wujimin:instance-cache-check into 6c4c1c1 on apache:master.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/*
package org.apache.servicecomb.serviceregistry.registry;/*
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The package should add below the License header.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, this happened randomly
do you know why......

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@wujimin wujimin force-pushed the instance-cache-check branch 2 times, most recently from f6c3e5e to a8eec4a Compare July 17, 2018 07:16
@wujimin wujimin force-pushed the instance-cache-check branch from a8eec4a to c7dbbd8 Compare July 17, 2018 07:28
@wujimin wujimin requested review from WillemJiang and liubao68 July 17, 2018 07:40
@wujimin wujimin merged commit 082b0dc into apache:master Jul 19, 2018
@wujimin wujimin deleted the instance-cache-check branch August 21, 2018 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants