Skip to content

[SCB-1021] Add vertx client server meters#997

Merged
liubao68 merged 10 commits intoapache:masterfrom
wujimin:add-vertx-client-server-meters
Nov 24, 2018
Merged

[SCB-1021] Add vertx client server meters#997
liubao68 merged 10 commits intoapache:masterfrom
wujimin:add-vertx-client-server-meters

Conversation

@wujimin
Copy link
Contributor

@wujimin wujimin commented Nov 19, 2018

No description provided.

@wujimin wujimin force-pushed the add-vertx-client-server-meters branch 2 times, most recently from 9dfa972 to 2c95a52 Compare November 19, 2018 13:46
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 19, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 86.772% when pulling ab21b7e on wujimin:add-vertx-client-server-meters into defbfa4 on apache:master.

// so need to support node not exist
public double findChildAndSummary(String childName) {
MeasurementNode node = findChild(childName);
return node != null ? node.summary() : 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only return 0 is ok ? can we prevent the lost of measurements, maybe we can shorter the interval of gaugePollingFrequency

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

too expensive
first time and expired is rare event, just make it not cause problem is enough

@wujimin wujimin force-pushed the add-vertx-client-server-meters branch from d24c0e3 to 0952bbe Compare November 21, 2018 08:18
@wujimin wujimin force-pushed the add-vertx-client-server-meters branch from 0952bbe to ab21b7e Compare November 24, 2018 00:41
@liubao68 liubao68 merged commit 229b3c2 into apache:master Nov 24, 2018
@wujimin wujimin deleted the add-vertx-client-server-meters branch December 5, 2018 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants