Remove stale versions

[janhoy]

We should not pretend that we support v 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 since they won't receive pathces.
Better remove them from the list at https://hub.docker.com/_/solr so people can see how old they are.

Q: Should this be part of the rel wizard, same way as we remove old releases from CDN?

[epugh]

Some automation or an explicit step would be good or this will get skipped in the future!

[HoustonPutman]

9.5 was just released, so I'd say it would be good to give a little bit of time before removing security updates for 9.4 at least. Otherwise I'm good with this.

[janhoy]

9.5 was just released, so I'd say it would be good to give a little bit of time before removing security updates for 9.4 at least. Otherwise I'm good with this.

I can agree to this. Let's keep 9.4.1 auto refreshed with Linux+JRE updates for yet some time to bring that added value during the window where users still is planning upgrades to 9.5.

[janhoy]

Some automation or an explicit step would be good or this will get skipped in the future!

Perhaps rel.wizard could simply have a step asking RM to reflect over which versions to keep.

[ozlerhakan]

Hey, well, I'm sorry to bother you here as my question would be out of this topic. I'm wondering why 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.5.0, 9.5.0-slim don't support arm64, but 9 and latest do? Do you think there is an issue in those releases?

[HoustonPutman]

Hey, well, I'm sorry to bother you here as my question would be out of this topic. I'm wondering why 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.5.0, 9.5.0-slim don't support arm64, but 9 and latest do? Do you think there is an issue in those releases?

I think that's an issue with either the official docker images team or with the Docker hub UI.... As you can see here, we put the architectures for all of the tags, not just latest or 9