[SPARK-29578][TESTS][2.4] Add "8634" as another skipped day for Kwajalein timzeone due to more recent timezone updates in later JDK 8#27386
Closed
srowen wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.4from
Closed
Conversation
…timzeone due to more recent timezone updates in later JDK 8 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Recent timezone definition changes in very new JDK 8 (and beyond) releases cause test failures. The below was observed on JDK 1.8.0_232. As before, the easy fix is to allow for these inconsequential variations in test results due to differing definition of timezones. ### Why are the changes needed? Keeps test passing on the latest JDK releases. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? None ### How was this patch tested? Existing tests Closes apache#26236 from srowen/SPARK-29578. Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
dongjoon-hyun
changed the title
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2020
Member
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM. (Pending Jenkins)
Thank you, @srowen .
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2020
|
Test build #117523 has finished for PR 27386 at commit
|
Member
|
Merged to branch-2.4. |
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2020
…lein timzeone due to more recent timezone updates in later JDK 8 (Backport of #26236) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Recent timezone definition changes in very new JDK 8 (and beyond) releases cause test failures. The below was observed on JDK 1.8.0_232. As before, the easy fix is to allow for these inconsequential variations in test results due to differing definition of timezones. ### Why are the changes needed? Keeps test passing on the latest JDK releases. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? None ### How was this patch tested? Existing tests Closes #27386 from srowen/SPARK-29578.2. Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Member
|
Thank you, @srowen and @HyukjinKwon . |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(Backport of #26236)
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Recent timezone definition changes in very new JDK 8 (and beyond) releases cause test failures. The below was observed on JDK 1.8.0_232. As before, the easy fix is to allow for these inconsequential variations in test results due to differing definition of timezones.
Why are the changes needed?
Keeps test passing on the latest JDK releases.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
None
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests