Skip to content

[SPARK-36158][PYTHON][DOCS] Improving pyspark sql/functions months_between documentation#33366

Closed
dominikgehl wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
dominikgehl:feature/SPARK-36158
Closed

[SPARK-36158][PYTHON][DOCS] Improving pyspark sql/functions months_between documentation#33366
dominikgehl wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
dominikgehl:feature/SPARK-36158

Conversation

@dominikgehl
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Updating pyspark months_between documentation to the precision in the scala documentation

Why are the changes needed?

Documentation clarity

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Only documentation change

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon changed the title [SPARK-36158] Improving pyspark sql/functions months_between documentation [SPARK-36158][PYTHON][DOCS] Improving pyspark sql/functions months_between documentation Jul 15, 2021
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 15, 2021

Test build #141079 has finished for PR 33366 at commit 0fc2783.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 15, 2021

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/45593/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 15, 2021

Kubernetes integration test status success
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/45593/

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member

MaxGekk commented Jul 15, 2021

+1, LGTM. Merging to master.
Thank you, @dominikgehl and @HyukjinKwon for review.

@MaxGekk MaxGekk closed this in 2db7ed7 Jul 15, 2021
@dominikgehl dominikgehl deleted the feature/SPARK-36158 branch July 19, 2021 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants