-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-36216][PYTHON][TESTS] Increase timeout for StreamingLinearRegressionWithTests. test_parameter_convergence #33427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Test build #141290 has finished for PR 33427 at commit
|
|
Kubernetes integration test starting |
|
test failures in GA should be unrelated. @dongjoon-hyun, mind taking a quick look please? |
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM. Thank you, @HyukjinKwon !
|
Kubernetes integration test status success |
|
Thanks! |
|
Merged to master, branch-3.2, branch-3.1 and branch-3.0. |
…essionWithTests. test_parameter_convergence ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586): ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 391, in test_parameter_convergence eventually(condition, catch_assertions=True) File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 91, in eventually raise lastValue File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 82, in eventually lastValue = condition() File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 387, in condition self.assertEqual(len(model_weights), len(batches)) AssertionError: 9 != 10 ``` Should probably increase timeout ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid flakiness in the test. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Nope, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? CI should test it out. Closes #33427 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36216. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6b974f) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…essionWithTests. test_parameter_convergence ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586): ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 391, in test_parameter_convergence eventually(condition, catch_assertions=True) File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 91, in eventually raise lastValue File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 82, in eventually lastValue = condition() File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 387, in condition self.assertEqual(len(model_weights), len(batches)) AssertionError: 9 != 10 ``` Should probably increase timeout ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid flakiness in the test. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Nope, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? CI should test it out. Closes #33427 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36216. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6b974f) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…essionWithTests. test_parameter_convergence ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586): ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 391, in test_parameter_convergence eventually(condition, catch_assertions=True) File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 91, in eventually raise lastValue File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 82, in eventually lastValue = condition() File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 387, in condition self.assertEqual(len(model_weights), len(batches)) AssertionError: 9 != 10 ``` Should probably increase timeout ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid flakiness in the test. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Nope, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? CI should test it out. Closes #33427 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36216. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6b974f) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…essionWithTests. test_parameter_convergence ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586): ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 391, in test_parameter_convergence eventually(condition, catch_assertions=True) File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 91, in eventually raise lastValue File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 82, in eventually lastValue = condition() File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 387, in condition self.assertEqual(len(model_weights), len(batches)) AssertionError: 9 != 10 ``` Should probably increase timeout ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid flakiness in the test. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Nope, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? CI should test it out. Closes apache#33427 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36216. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6b974f) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586):
Should probably increase timeout
Why are the changes needed?
To avoid flakiness in the test.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Nope, dev-only.
How was this patch tested?
CI should test it out.